• About
  • Apologetics, Theology, and Political Posts
  • Home
  • Sermons
  • Son of God Human Supremacy: Future Humanity’s Destiny in Him

Against All Odds

~ Engage Life

Against All Odds

Category Archives: Traditional Problems in the Debate between Theism and Atheism

God’s not Dead based on your Assumptions

09 Thursday Oct 2014

Posted by Prime Theologian in Traditional Problems in the Debate between Theism and Atheism

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Assumptions, Existence of God, Falsification, Hume, Miracles, Theism, Verification

David Hume long ago made the point that we need remarkable evidence to accept exceptional miracles. There is an assumption in Hume’s thought from the very beginning. His argument can be laid out like this:

Miracles entail the existence of God

Miracles are exceptionally improbable

Exceptional evidence is necessary for the exceptionally improbable

We do not have exceptional evidence

Therefore, it is highly probably that God does not exist

The imperative question of course is “exceptional to whom?” Hume’s argument, understood in this way, unfairly stakes the deck in favor of concluding that God does not exist. The second premise, “Miracles are exceptionally improbable,” already includes the conclusion: “If God does not exist, then miracles are exceptionally improbable.” Taken this way, Hume’s argument is clearly question begging or arguing in a circle: “since God does not exist miracles are exceptionally improbably, therefore, God does not exist.” If we assume God’s existence, understanding Him under classical Perfection theology (Anselm), then miracles are not improbable, but only as problematic as God deciding to enact His will. But how hard is it to use your will? I can will right now to stop typing, or continue, or get out of the chair, and so forth. If I were like God, I would be omnipotence, omnipresence, and omniscience, leaving no miracle impossible or improbable to the extent of God’ own definitive nature and schema for His interaction with creation. Thus, Hume’s second premise needs to be reworked to make his argument neutral rather than assuming philosophical naturalism (atheism), which inexorably leads to the atheistic conclusion. Perhaps the following might be a fair reworking:

Miracles entail the existence of God

Miracles are indeterminate in their probability apart from the evidential circumstances within which they occur

Miracles require enough evidence to verify their divine origin while also being tested by naturalistic theories to try to falsify its divine origin

Due diligence is performed by testing positively and negatively (verification and falsification) a miracle; to the extent that a miracle is given due diligence, it is rational to suppose it has occurred or that it has not occurred, depending on the outcome of verification and falsification

Therefore, God may or may not exist depending on each individual miracle’s case.

It may not be obvious, but the theists’ job is much easier because if even one miracle is verified, then theism is demonstrably true unless later the miracle’s occurrence can be defeated; the atheist (philosophical naturalist) must falsify every miracle in order to maintain atheism (philosophical naturalism). If the theist calls some miracle that was falsified into question, and then defeats that falsification, theism follows.

B. T. Scalise

Recent Posts

  • The Fall of Historic Liberalism: How it became Autocratic Liberalism through a Discussion of Freedom, morality, and God
  • Some Thoughts on Critical Race Theory as a System of Liberal Ideology
  • The Future of Humanity as Contained in the Humanity of the Son of God
  • Power, Demonism, and the Likeness to Governmental Power
  • World Economic Forum, Transhumanism, and Afterlife (part 9):Their Notion of Heaven and a Comparison

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • January 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • June 2012

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Adam and Eve
  • afterlife
  • Anachronism
  • and Bitterness
  • Apologetics
  • apotheosis
  • artificial intelligence
  • Baggett and Walls
  • Beauty
  • bias
  • Biblical Application
  • Biblical Interpretation
  • Blaspheme
  • Christ
  • Christ and Culture
  • Christ and Economic
  • Christ and the Politico-Economic
  • Christian Ministry
  • Christmas
  • Christology
  • Church Leadership
  • Comparative Religion
  • contingent
  • Copycat
  • cosmic origins
  • Creating
  • Defending Resurrection of Jesus
  • despotism
  • devaluation of currency
  • Difficult Questions
  • Difficult Texts
  • Dimensions
  • Discipleship
  • discrimination
  • Economics
  • Elitism
  • Enlightenment
  • entropy
  • eternal life
  • Exegesis and Interpretation
  • Expecting Parents
  • fascism
  • Fear
  • Freedom
  • futility
  • Gay marriage
  • Gender Issues
  • Genesis
  • God
  • God Speaks
  • Good God
  • Gospels
  • Government
  • hades
  • Hallucinations
  • heaven
  • Hebrews
  • hell
  • Historical Issues with Resurrection
  • Holy Spirit
  • Homosexuality
  • Homosexuals
  • human error
  • Human Experience and Theology
  • Humlity
  • Hypostatic Union
  • Illumination
  • imagination
  • Incarnation
  • Inerrancy
  • Infallibility
  • inspiration
  • Jesus
  • Joy
  • justice
  • law of thermodynamics
  • Learning
  • Legends
  • Libertarianism
  • limitations
  • monetary policy
  • Moral Apologetics
  • Morality
  • mystery
  • Near Death Experiences/Consciousness
  • Origen
  • Philosophical Explanations for God
  • plato
  • Pregnancy and Theology
  • preservation
  • Problem of Evil
  • Resurrection
  • Satan
  • Science
  • Scripture
  • soul
  • Spiritual Formation
  • Spiritual Warfare
  • Textual Criticism
  • Theodicy
  • Theological Interpretation
  • theology
  • Traditional Problems in the Debate between Theism and Atheism
  • Transhumanism
  • Trinity
  • Trinity and Allah
  • Trinity and Pregnancy
  • Truth
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtues
  • WEF
  • World Economic Forum
  • Zombies

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.