• About
  • Apologetics, Theology, and Political Posts
  • Home
  • Sermons
  • Son of God Human Supremacy: Future Humanity’s Destiny in Him

Against All Odds

~ Engage Life

Against All Odds

Tag Archives: typology

Typology of the typological-historic type

17 Friday Oct 2014

Posted by Prime Theologian in Biblical Interpretation

≈ Comments Off on Typology of the typological-historic type

Tags

god, Prophecy, Scripture, typology

The second type of typology is historic in nature. There are certain patterns of activity that God likes to work in the through. These patterns occur and reoccur again and again across the pages of Scripture — and perhaps in other events. In Scripture, we can trace these patterns back to God clearly and with little doubt because He chose to reveal Himself through His activity in and through the events recorded and interpreted in and by Scripture. God is the redeemer who oversees the first Exodus in the Book of Exodus. This “exodus type” is not prophetic in its own right. There are not indications that the Exodus narrative is predicting something about the future. As God reveals more of Himself and His activity in history, it becomes clearer that the “exodus type” is something God likes to use. We find, then, Israel’s later return from captivity in Babylon being interpreted by the Prophets as another Exodus albeit far less spectacular than the first. Luke records in Lk. 9:31 that Jesus was leading a new exodus as well. The first Exodus in the Book of Exodus is just an event, but later revelation by God shows that this historic event was setting a fountain of God’s preferential activity in history. Thus, the NT author Luke can use the Exodus, not as a prophecy in its own right, but as an indication of the same God who led Israel for 40 years in the wilderness who was now leading humanity in the Son of God Jesus.

B. T. Scalise

Biblical Interpretation: the Difference between Allegory and Typology

08 Wednesday Oct 2014

Posted by Prime Theologian in Biblical Interpretation

≈ Comments Off on Biblical Interpretation: the Difference between Allegory and Typology

Tags

Allegory, Biblical Intepretation, Scripture, typology

Allegory and typology differ because allegory wholly removes the meaning of one thing and replaces it with another but typology builds and uses parts of that meaning. For instance, Hagar in Gal. 4 represents Mt. Sinai; the meaning, “a woman named Hagar” is removed and replaced with “a mountain where the law was given.” But typology would use parts of the meaning of the type while “unpacking” or “increasing” or “adding to” that earlier type. Jesus and Adam are a good example; both men are founders of a humanity (same meaning) but Jesus is God (additional meaning added) and not the founder of sinful humanity (like Adam) but of righteous humanity. Allegory need not be historical, but typology must. Take Hebrews 11:16’s report that persons of faith seek a better country, a heavenly one and the heavenly Jerusalem. The earthly land and city of Jerusalem are historical places, and they act as types for their heavenly correlates. Moses was told this long along in the Book of Exodus: 25:40:

“And see that you make them after the pattern for them, which is being shown you on the mountain.”

The author of Hebrew expands,

“They serve as a copy and shadow of the heavenly things” (Heb. 8:5; 9:23)

Moses saw heavenly realities on the Mountain of God, Sinai, and God commands Him to create the Tabernacle and all that was in it “after” these heavenly patterns He saw. Similarly, God crafted the history around Jerusalem so that it stood for God and as the City of God. This historical reality then acts to help us think about the heavenly reality waiting to be revealed during the eschaton, when heaven meets earth (Revelation 21).

Dr. Scalise

Typology: then and now

07 Tuesday Oct 2014

Posted by Prime Theologian in Biblical Interpretation

≈ Comments Off on Typology: then and now

Tags

biblical interpretation, interpretation, Jesus' use of scripture, typology

The Catholic Church has long recognized the use of typology in the Old Testament as foreshadowing the New; in the Catholic Catechism, typology is called allegorical interpretation. This is a bit misleading because allegory is more different than the same to typology. I want to just comment a bit on how we can practically use typology today and why it is important to understand it for this very reason. An example of typology is the serpent (snake) plague that descended on the Israelites during the Exodus because of their evil. God instructs Moses to hold a representation of a serpent up on a pole and any who look to it would live even though they had been bitten. Jesus later refers Nicodemus to this event, noting that the Son of man must be hung similarly (John 3). Jesus is using typology; Jesus represents humanity and then crucified for humanity’s rightful death. Any who look to this symbol of death — Jesus in the Gospels and the serpent in Exodus — will live. The imagery from the OT is of death hung on a pole meaning life for those who looked to it; so it is with Jesus in the NT. How can we use this today? There seems to be two major issues in the way. First, we need to know what the typologies in the Bible are designed to present. In the example above, Jesus is showing us not only that God will later use Jesus’ death to mean life for others but also that God favors this type of typology, as illustrated earlier in the Exodus. Second, once we have a handle on how a typology represents God, we need to know when and how to apply it. We can become this “symbol of death leading to others’ life” that Jesus so richly exemplified. We can become typologies of both the Exodus account and of Jesus’ crucifixion. It is not easy, but we may become the embodiment of death leading to life in the way Mother Teresa did. She put herself in a context of death, endangering her own, so as to pass life-giving care to others. We could be utterly harmed for the sake of others good, with perhaps unbelieving friends or family watching. If we do, we have become a typology of what Jesus represented: namely, being victimized, harmed, taken advantage of for others’ good. We cannot guarantee how others will view our “dramatization,” but we can lift a prayer to God to make it typological of Him, His Son, and His life-giving characters, even when it costs Him (Romans 8:32). God is the God of over pouring love who did spare even His own Son, but gave Him up for us. This is radically shocking. Can I, can we, be the sacrifice (death) for enriching others (bringing life). A stout person this takes, as the Lord prepares every person for such courageous service.

Dr. Scalise

Recent Posts

  • Another Grand Psyop of the Church (part 2)
  • Another Grand Psyop on the Church (part 1)
  • Competition and Hope
  • What makes Heaven heavenly and Hopeful?
  • Artificial Intelligence: A Crisis for Human Labor (Part 2)

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • January 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • June 2012

Categories

  • Abortion
  • Adam and Eve
  • afterlife
  • Anachronism
  • and Bitterness
  • Apologetics
  • apotheosis
  • artificial intelligence
  • Baggett and Walls
  • Beauty
  • bias
  • Biblical Application
  • Biblical Interpretation
  • Blaspheme
  • Christ
  • Christ and Culture
  • Christ and Economic
  • Christ and the Politico-Economic
  • Christian Ministry
  • Christmas
  • Christology
  • Church Leadership
  • Comparative Religion
  • contingent
  • Copycat
  • cosmic origins
  • Creating
  • Defending Resurrection of Jesus
  • despotism
  • devaluation of currency
  • Difficult Questions
  • Difficult Texts
  • Dimensions
  • Discipleship
  • discrimination
  • Economics
  • Elitism
  • Enlightenment
  • entropy
  • eternal life
  • Exegesis and Interpretation
  • Expecting Parents
  • fascism
  • Fear
  • Freedom
  • futility
  • Gay marriage
  • Gender Issues
  • Genesis
  • God
  • God Speaks
  • Good God
  • Gospels
  • Government
  • hades
  • Hallucinations
  • heaven
  • Hebrews
  • hell
  • Historical Issues with Resurrection
  • Holy Spirit
  • Homosexuality
  • Homosexuals
  • human error
  • Human Experience and Theology
  • Humlity
  • Hypostatic Union
  • Illumination
  • imagination
  • Incarnation
  • Inerrancy
  • Infallibility
  • inspiration
  • Jesus
  • Joy
  • justice
  • law of thermodynamics
  • Learning
  • Legends
  • Libertarianism
  • limitations
  • monetary policy
  • Moral Apologetics
  • Morality
  • mystery
  • Near Death Experiences/Consciousness
  • Origen
  • Philosophical Explanations for God
  • plato
  • Pregnancy and Theology
  • preservation
  • Problem of Evil
  • Resurrection
  • Satan
  • Science
  • Scripture
  • soul
  • Spiritual Formation
  • Spiritual Warfare
  • Textual Criticism
  • Theodicy
  • Theological Interpretation
  • theology
  • Traditional Problems in the Debate between Theism and Atheism
  • Transhumanism
  • Trinity
  • Trinity and Allah
  • Trinity and Pregnancy
  • Truth
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtues
  • WEF
  • World Economic Forum
  • Zombies

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.